Should UK police remain unarmed Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Should UK legal philosophy remain unarmed - Essay ExampleThey deliberate upon the fact that the existing threats luring over UK call for prolong defense, carrying of arms is an integral part. This would not only introduce arms in the police, but having ex-soldiers would give it a militarized look that would essentially be dictating outrank rather than maintaining order.Secondly, they advocate that the relationship ship between armed crime in Britain versus the number of policemen trained with armed is inversely proportional over the departed five years. They present this as a glaring proof and tenableness to reverse the strategy on gun work for police, and start being more than pro active in the situation. The interesting implication in this context is the fact that regardless of the number and level of trained officers, what shall be relevant is whether they atomic number 18 allowed to carry weapons or notAnother important point to their stance is when they narrate, In 2003-0 4 there were 11,630 assaults on police in England and Wales, equivalent to a officer or woman attacked every 45 minutes. This in turn gives a very defenseless impression of the police and gives them a more potent reason to ask for weapons during duty. Those who cant protect themselves, inherently cant do eachthing for othersThis arti This article, being written shortly after the killing of the police woman is forceful to the extent of emotionalism. Though concrete in its presentation, yet the opposition may state in contradiction that one incident alone can do little to change the decades of polity formulation of the policing service in Britain. Nonetheless, it elucidates a very strong stance unto the dire need and necessity of the police to be armed adequately. Review 2The Bombing and Human Rights, posted at the World Socialist Website argues against the unquestionable power available to the British police these days, on account of weapon handling, searches and arrests. Julie Hy land writes only when weeks after the infamous London bombings, influenced deeply by the innocent killing of a Brazilian national by the police. This text hence ardently cautions against the use of fire arms by the British police.The country that long prided itself on a tradition of unarmed policing has become one in which armed police are empowered to act with impunity, is the unequivocal opinion of the writer. She is of the belief that uncontrollable political and security circumstances incur given the police incontrollable rights something that is intolerable for any profession in the society. Something that is beyond control is not likely to produce any level of control itself. Not only has this broken the traditions of the UK police, but as well has given them the blind license to practice as they please.The article further highlights that the metropolitan police commissioner, following the aforementioned killing went on record to have said, Even more innocent people could b e killed. This instills unparalleled amounts of fear and horror in the minds of ordinary civilians, specially the minority communities. The rights and sanctities of the people at enormous is considered to be devastated if their protectors start portraying such views. In addition, this helps the British public at large to lose their faith and trust in the